DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-037
Other Than Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6, Art 12-B-21, KFS, For the good of
the Service, RE4
Honorable
None
None
TIS 7 yrs, 3 months, 23 days
Policy Implications _| None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for For The Good Of The Service in the Spring of 2006. The applicant’s
complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.
In early 2006, the applicant was facing Court Martial charges for failing to provide a valid urine sample during
a unit urinalysis. This offense followed occurred after the Non-Judicial Punishments in 2000, 2005, and 2006. .
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant has not provided any new
documentation.
The applicant voluntarily requested this discharge via memorandum. The applicant knowingly requested and
accepted an ‘Other Than Honorable’ discharge. The applicant entered into this agreement to avoid further
punishment with the impending Court Martial charges.
Within a Triable by Court Martial mechanism, the SPD code of KFS is the standard to separate individuals for
the ‘Good of the Service’ with the Under Other Than Honorable character of service.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 023
1.B.20, KFS, Triable by Court Martial, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED BY DRB CORRECTIONS | TIS Policy Implications 4 yrs, 9 months, 16 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Triable By Court Martial due to be being an accessory in theft (after the fact), disobeying a direct order, and procuring a prostitute. The applicant requested to be separated ‘For the Good of the Service’ in lieu of the Court martial (CM) proceedings and punishment. Therefore, the board by a majority vote...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011477
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 8 Mos, 20 Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013372
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 along with attached documents. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 039
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-039 TIS 2 yrs, 1 month, 26 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged due to a voluntary request as part of a pretrial agreement for separation in lieu of Special Court Martial proceedings. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board does note that the DD-214 incorrectly cites the Separation Authority as COMDTINST M1000.6A, Art 12.B.1.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014543
He asks for a second chance and requests an RE code change to be able to join as an enlisted soldier and make it right. On 22 August 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007897
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001084
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result, it is inequitable. In essence the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001084aC071031
Yes No Counsel: No Witnesses/Observers: No Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result, it is inequitable. In essence the applicant’s separation action was initiated while the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012268
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017872
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...